Simple is Beautiful | Technology, Programming, Video Games
This blog is about technology, programming, video games, books and other related topics. It is published by Mark Papadakis.

Linux Kernel Development ( book )

I am currently reading Linux Kernel Development, by Robert Love. This book serves as a great introduction ( it actual aims to become the canonical reference for intrepid kernel hackers ) to some fundamental operating system concepts (or, rather, kernel concepts ) and goes into great length describing how the Kernel ( version 2.6 ) is structured and how the various subsystems work.

For instance, the 2.6 process scheduler is a marvel of engineering. Extremely simple and extremely efficient. It reminds me of a similar solution I had to come up with, for one of our services, but mine wasn't near as elegant, really.
I have only read a couple of pages thus far, but everything makes sense. The linux kernel hackers are aiming for simple(=clean), elegant and efficient solutions, the kind of solutions that yield the best possible performance because they are kept simple and are extremely optimized. Its just sad that the quality of the majority of the surrounding applications running in user-space ( desktop managers, open source applications.. ) do not follow this route. If there was a desktop manager ( say, Gnome ) that would have been as well thought of and well build as the underlying OS kernel, Linux would have been a champion that would drive fear to Microsoft and friends.

The Microsoft engineers should do the 'right' ( which is essence is wrong, of course) thing. Study the Linux Kernel source code and rebuild the Vista kernel by following the algorithms and design decisions found in the Linux Kernel. While they are at it, they should make sure to stay away from the concept of microkernels - even if the microkernel servers exist in kernel space ( which invalidates the whole idea behind microkernls anyway ), as it is the case with Windows, its a BAD thing to do. Performance matters. Perhaps, then, Windows would be at least an order of magnitude faster and wouldn't require so much iron ( pumped up hardware requirements ) to run.

Tagged with: microsoft , programming , linux
Published at Friday, 13 October 2006 7:22 pm

Post as anonymous -

HTML tags are not allowed for comments on this blog


« Southpark / Warcraft Standing on the shoulders of giants »
Powered by Pathfinder Blogs